Page 92 - 79_02
P. 92

A.	
  Gómez	
  et	
  col.	
  

	
  
to	
   total	
   ERK	
   (p-­-ERK/total	
   ERK)	
   showed	
   significantly	
   higher	
   values	
   in	
   the	
   atenolol	
  
than	
  in	
  the	
  control	
  group	
  (Figure	
  6).	
  	
  

                                                                                                                                   	
  
Figure	
   4.-­-	
   Protein	
  oxidation,	
  glycoxidation	
  and	
  lipoxidation	
  indicators	
  in	
  heart	
  mitochondria	
  from	
  
control	
   and	
   atenolol	
   treated	
   mice.	
   Values	
   are	
   means	
   ±	
   SEM	
   from	
   6	
   different	
   animals	
   and	
   are	
  
expressed	
   as	
   percentage	
   of	
   those	
   in	
   the	
   controls	
   for	
   each	
   protein	
   modification	
   marker.	
   Control	
  
values:	
   3,817±128	
   (glutamic	
   semialdehyde,	
   GSA);	
   434±37	
   (AASA,	
   aminoadipic	
   semialdehyde,	
  
AASA);	
   557±41	
   (carboxyethyl-­-lysine,	
   CEL);	
   1038±77	
   (carboxymethyl-­-lysine,	
   CML);	
   16295±364	
  
(malondialdehyde-­-lysine,	
   MDAL).	
   Units:	
   µmol/mol	
   lysine.	
   Asterisks	
   represent	
   significant	
  
differences	
  between	
  the	
  control	
  and	
  the	
  atenolol	
  group.	
  **	
  P<0.01;	
  ***	
  P<0.001.	
  
	
  

	
   No	
   significant	
   differences	
   in	
   heart	
   rate,	
   or	
   the	
   systolic,	
   mean	
   and	
   diastolic	
  
arterial	
   blood	
   pressures	
   were	
   observed	
   at	
   18	
   months	
   of	
   age	
   (Figure	
   7A).	
   In	
  
contrast,	
   the	
   heart	
   rate	
   measured	
   at	
   35	
   months	
   of	
   age	
   was	
   significantly	
   and	
  
strongly	
   decreased	
   in	
   the	
   atenolol	
   group	
   (Figure	
   7B),	
   whereas	
   the	
   systolic,	
   mean	
  
and	
  diastolic	
  arterial	
  pressures	
  trends	
  to	
  decreased	
  values	
  did	
  not	
  reach	
  statistical	
  
significance	
  (Figure	
  7B).	
  

        Finally,	
  the	
  Kaplan	
  Meier´s	
  survival	
  curve	
  (Figure	
  8)	
  showed	
  a	
  similar	
  mean	
  
life	
  span	
  (50%	
  survival)	
  and	
  a	
  lower	
  maximum	
  (at	
  10%	
  survival)	
  longevity	
  in	
  the	
  
atenolol	
   group	
   only	
   at	
   old	
   age,	
   the	
   difference	
   in	
   survival	
   starting	
   only	
   after	
   28	
  
months	
  of	
  age.	
  
	
  

262	
  	
  

	
  
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97