Page 119 - 76_02
P. 119
VOL. 76 (2), 223-239, 2010 PREDICTION OF LIGAND BINDING ENERGY...
11. Essman, U.; Perela, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H. & Pedersen, L.
G. (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical
Physics. 103(19): 8577-8593.
12. Åqvist, J. & Hansson, T. (1996) On the Validity of Electrostatic Linear Res-
ponse in Polar Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. 100(22): 9512-9521.
13. GNU/PSPP. 2007, Free Software Fundation. p. PSPP is a program for statis-
tical analysis of sampled data.
14. C.f.v.m., Betamethasone - Summary report. 1999.
15. Eliard, P. H. & Rousseau, G. G. (1984) Thermodynamics of steroid binding to
the human glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem. J. 218(2): 395-404.
16. Alam, M. A. & Naik, P. K. (2009) Applying linear interaction energy method
for binding affinity calculations of podophyllotoxin analogues with tubulin
using continuum solvent model and prediction of cytotoxic activity. J. Mol.
Graph Model. 27(8): 930-43.
17. van Lipzig, M. M.; ter Laak, A. M.; Jongejan, A.; Vermeulen, N. P.; Wamelink,
M., Geerke, D. & Meerman, J. H. (2004) Prediction of ligand binding affinity
and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dyna-
mics simulations and the linear interaction energy method. J. Med. Chem.
47(4): 1018-30.
* Información de contacto:
Álvaro Cortés Cabrera.
Unidad de Bioinformática.
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa. CSIC-UAM.
C/ Nicolás Cabrera, 1. Campus de Cantoblanco.
28049 Madrid.
Teléf.: +34 91 373 55 28.
E-mail: acortes@cbm.uam.es
239
